Files
openthread/tests/scripts/thread-cert/test_mle_msg_key_seq_jump.py
T
Abtin Keshavarzian b6ac79f61a [test] fix test_mle_msg_key_seq_jump (#7952)
This commit updates `test_mle_msg_key_seq_jump` to increase the wait
time after key index change for MLE advertisement transmissions. The
MLE advertisement uses trickle timer with max interval of 32 seconds.
Based on this the max interval between two consecutive advertisement
transmissions can be 1.5 times the trickle timer max interval or 48
seconds. The test uses 52 sec as wait time which includes a 4 sec
additional guard time to account for any action and/or message
exchanges after rx of an advertisement. This change should help
address the occasional failures of this test.
2022-07-27 18:58:47 -07:00

242 lines
8.2 KiB
Python
Executable File

#!/usr/bin/env python3
#
# Copyright (c) 2022, The OpenThread Authors.
# All rights reserved.
#
# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
# 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
# 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
# documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
# 3. Neither the name of the copyright holder nor the
# names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products
# derived from this software without specific prior written permission.
#
# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS"
# AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
# IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
# ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE
# LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
# CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF
# SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS
# INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN
# CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
# ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
# POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
#
import ipaddress
import unittest
import command
import config
import thread_cert
# Test description:
#
# This test verifies behavior of MLE related to handling of received
# larger key sequence based on the MLE message class (authoritative,
# or peer).
#
#
# Topology:
#
# leader --- router
# | \
# | \
# child reed
#
LEADER = 1
CHILD = 2
REED = 3
ROUTER = 4
class MleMsgKeySeqJump(thread_cert.TestCase):
USE_MESSAGE_FACTORY = False
SUPPORT_NCP = False
TOPOLOGY = {
LEADER: {
'name': 'LEADER',
'mode': 'rdn',
},
CHILD: {
'name': 'CHILD',
'is_mtd': True,
'mode': 'rn',
},
REED: {
'name': 'REED',
'mode': 'rn'
},
ROUTER: {
'name': 'ROUTER',
'mode': 'rdn',
},
}
def test(self):
leader = self.nodes[LEADER]
child = self.nodes[CHILD]
reed = self.nodes[REED]
router = self.nodes[ROUTER]
nodes = [leader, child, reed, router]
#-------------------------------------------------------------------
# Form the network.
for node in nodes:
node.set_key_sequence_counter(0)
leader.start()
self.simulator.go(config.LEADER_STARTUP_DELAY)
self.assertEqual(leader.get_state(), 'leader')
child.start()
reed.start()
self.simulator.go(5)
self.assertEqual(child.get_state(), 'child')
self.assertEqual(reed.get_state(), 'child')
router.start()
self.simulator.go(config.ROUTER_STARTUP_DELAY)
self.assertEqual(router.get_state(), 'router')
#-------------------------------------------------------------------
# Validate the initial key seq counter on all nodes
for node in nodes:
self.assertEqual(node.get_key_sequence_counter(), 0)
#-------------------------------------------------------------------
# Manually increase the key seq on child. Then change MLE mode on
# child which triggers a "Child Update Request" to its parent
# (leader). The key jump noticed on parent side would trigger an
# authoritative MLE Child Update exchange (including challenge and
# response TLVs) and causes the parent (leader) to also adopt the
# larger key seq.
child.set_key_sequence_counter(5)
self.assertEqual(child.get_key_sequence_counter(), 5)
child.set_mode('r')
self.simulator.go(1)
self.assertEqual(child.get_key_sequence_counter(), 5)
self.assertEqual(leader.get_key_sequence_counter(), 5)
#-------------------------------------------------------------------
# Wait long enough for MLE Advertisement to be sent. This would
# trigger reed and router to also notice key seq jump and try to
# re-establish link again (using authoritative exchanges). Validate
# that all nodes are using the new key seq.
self.simulator.go(52)
for node in nodes:
self.assertEqual(node.get_key_sequence_counter(), 5)
#-------------------------------------------------------------------
# Manually increase the key seq on leader. Wait for max time between
# advertisements. This would trigger both reed and router
# to notice key seq jump and try to re-establish link (link
# request/accept exchange). Validate that they all adopt the new
# key seq.
leader.set_key_sequence_counter(10)
self.assertEqual(leader.get_key_sequence_counter(), 10)
self.simulator.go(52)
self.assertEqual(router.get_key_sequence_counter(), 10)
self.assertEqual(reed.get_key_sequence_counter(), 10)
#-------------------------------------------------------------------
# Change MLE mode on child to trigger a "Child Update Request" exchange
# which should then update the key seq on child as well.
child.set_mode('rn')
self.simulator.go(5)
self.assertEqual(child.get_key_sequence_counter(), 10)
#-------------------------------------------------------------------
# Stop all other nodes except for leader. Move the leader key seq
# forward and then restart all other node. Validate that router,
# reed and child all re-attach successfully and adopt the higher key
# sequence.
router.stop()
reed.stop()
child.stop()
leader.set_key_sequence_counter(15)
self.assertEqual(leader.get_key_sequence_counter(), 15)
child.start()
reed.start()
router.start()
self.simulator.go(5)
self.assertEqual(child.get_state(), 'child')
self.assertEqual(reed.get_state(), 'child')
self.assertEqual(router.get_state(), 'router')
for node in nodes:
self.assertEqual(node.get_key_sequence_counter(), 15)
#-------------------------------------------------------------------
# Stop all other nodes except for leader. Move the child key seq
# forward and then restart child. Ensure it re-attached successfully
# to leader and that leader adopts the higher key seq counter.
router.stop()
reed.stop()
child.stop()
child.set_key_sequence_counter(20)
self.assertEqual(child.get_key_sequence_counter(), 20)
child.start()
self.simulator.go(5)
self.assertEqual(child.get_state(), 'child')
self.assertEqual(leader.get_key_sequence_counter(), 20)
#-------------------------------------------------------------------
# Restart router and reed and ensure they are re-attached and get the
# higher key seq counter.
router.start()
reed.start()
self.simulator.go(5)
self.assertEqual(router.get_state(), 'router')
self.assertEqual(reed.get_state(), 'child')
self.assertEqual(router.get_key_sequence_counter(), 20)
self.assertEqual(reed.get_key_sequence_counter(), 20)
#-------------------------------------------------------------------
# Move forward the key seq counter by one on router. Wait for max
# time between advertisements. Validate that leader adopts the higher
# counter value.
router.set_key_sequence_counter(21)
self.assertEqual(router.get_key_sequence_counter(), 21)
self.simulator.go(52)
self.assertEqual(leader.get_key_sequence_counter(), 21)
self.assertEqual(reed.get_key_sequence_counter(), 21)
child.set_mode('r')
self.simulator.go(2)
self.assertEqual(child.get_key_sequence_counter(), 21)
if __name__ == '__main__':
unittest.main()