# Accuracy Evaluation ## Hypothesis testing methodology ### Null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis For a given dataset and model, the evaluated scores can be viewed as a population with mean $\mu$ and variance $\sigma$. Note that the distribution is not necessarily to be a normal distribution. When we finish implementing a model, we need to setup an accuracy *reference*. By evaluating the model on a subset of $n$ samples, we practically draw $n$ scores $x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n$ from the population, and thus we can compute and record the sample average $\bar{x} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i} x_i$. When testing if there is an accuracy *regression*, we once again evaluate the model on $n$ samples, resulting in $x'_1, x'_2, \dots, x'_n$, and also sample average $\bar{x'} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i} x'_i$. The question is that, are these $n$ samples drawn from the same distribution to the referenced one? This can be formulated as a hypothesis testing problem: * Null Hypothesis ($H_0$): $x'_1, x'_2, \dots, x'_n$ are drawn from the same distribution to the reference. * Alternative Hypothesis ($H_1$): $x'_1, x'_2, \dots, x'_n$ are from a different distribution from the reference. Since we care about accuracy regression only, so it should be a one-tailed hypothesis testing problem: * Null Hypothesis ($H_0$): $x'_1, x'_2, \dots, x'_n$ are drawn from a distribution with a mean equal to or higher than the reference. * Alternative Hypothesis ($H_1$): $x'_1, x'_2, \dots, x'_n$ are drawn from a distribution with a mean lower than the reference. ![Hypothesis Testing](./media/hypothesis-testing.svg) ### Two-sample t-test According to the two-sample t-test method, we can compute the t-statistic $t = \frac{\bar{x'} - \bar{x}}{\sqrt{2 \sigma^2 / n}}$. According to the Central Limit Theorem (CLT), the t-statistic is from a distribution that converges to the standard normal distribution $\mathcal{N} (0, 1)$. Given the threshold $\gamma$, the false positive (type I error) rate $\alpha$ can be formulated as: $$ \begin{equation*} \begin{aligned} \alpha &= P \left(\bar{x'} \leq \gamma \mid t \sim \mathcal{N} (0, 1) \right) \\ &= P \left(t \leq \frac{\gamma - \bar{x}}{\sqrt{2 \sigma^2 / n}} \mid t \sim \mathcal{N} (0, 1) \right). \end{aligned} \end{equation*} $$ In practive, we setup a $\alpha$ (e.g., 0.05) and then compute the threshold $\gamma$: $$ \begin{equation*} \gamma = \Phi^{-1} (\alpha) \cdot \sqrt{2 \sigma^2 / n} + \bar{x}. \end{equation*} $$ Note that $\alpha$ is typically smaller than 0.5, so $\gamma < \bar{x}$. Given the minimum detectable effect $\theta$, the false negative (type II error) rate $\beta$ can be formulated as: $$ \begin{equation*} \begin{aligned} \beta &= P \left(\bar{x'} > \gamma \mid t \sim \mathcal{N} (-\frac{\theta}{\sqrt{2 \sigma^2 / n}}, 1) \right) \\ &= P \left(t > \frac{\gamma - \bar{x}}{\sqrt{2 \sigma^2 / n}} \mid t \sim \mathcal{N} (-\frac{\theta}{\sqrt{2 \sigma^2 / n}}, 1) \right) \\ &= P \left(t + \frac{\theta}{\sqrt{2 \sigma^2 / n}} > \frac{\gamma - \bar{x} + \theta}{\sqrt{2 \sigma^2 / n}} \mid t + \frac{\theta}{\sqrt{2 \sigma^2 / n}} \sim \mathcal{N} (0, 1) \right) \\ &= P \left(t + \frac{\theta}{\sqrt{2 \sigma^2 / n}} > \Phi^{-1} (\alpha) + \frac{\theta}{\sqrt{2 \sigma^2 / n}} \mid t + \frac{\theta}{\sqrt{2 \sigma^2 / n}} \sim \mathcal{N} (0, 1) \right) \end{aligned} \end{equation*} $$ In practice, we setup a $\beta$ (e.g., 0.2) and then compute $\theta$: $$ \begin{equation*} \begin{aligned} \theta &= (\Phi^{-1} (1-\beta) - \Phi^{-1} (\alpha)) \cdot \sqrt{2 \sigma^2 / n} \\ &= - (\Phi^{-1} (\alpha) + \Phi^{-1} (\beta)) \cdot \sqrt{2 \sigma^2 / n} \end{aligned} \end{equation*} $$ Note that $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are typical smaller than 0.5, so $\theta > 0$. References: * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Student%27s_t-test * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_(statistics) ## Steps to add accuracy tests * Estimate $\sigma$ from the full dataset. * Decide a target minimum detectable effect $\theta$ based on the nature of dataset and corresponding accuracy metric. * Decide $\alpha$ and $\beta$ based on the importance of model. * Iterate sample volume $n$ from small to large, and compute $\theta$ until it satisfies (is equal to or lower than) the target $\theta$. * Evaluate the model on the subset of sample volume $n$, resulting in the reference accuracy. * The threshold $\gamma$ is automatically setup based on $\alpha$, $\sigma$, $n$ and the reference accuracy.